دوره 10، شماره 3 - ( 6-1399 )
جلد 10 شماره 3 صفحات 3280-3266 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sadeghi S, Ghandehariun S. Comparative Environmental Assessment of a Gasoline and Fuel Cell Vehicle with Alternative Hydrogen Pathways in Iran. ASE 2020; 10 (3) :3266-3280
URL: http://www.iust.ac.ir/ijae/article-1-552-fa.html
URL: http://www.iust.ac.ir/ijae/article-1-552-fa.html
Comparative Environmental Assessment of a Gasoline and Fuel Cell Vehicle with Alternative Hydrogen Pathways in Iran. Automotive Science and Engineering. 1399; 10 (3) :3266-3280
چکیده: (11152 مشاهده)
A comparative full life cycle assessment of a gasoline vehicle and a fuel cell vehicle (FCV) with five different fuel cycles including steam methane reforming (SMR), coal gasification, photovoltaic (PV), solar thermal, and grid-based electrolysis is presented in this paper. The results show that the total greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) are mainly found in the materials production and the component manufacturing stages of the FCV. Among various hydrogen production methods, the FCV with PV electrolysis has the lowest GHG emissions of 0.13 kg CO2 eq./km. The total GHG emissions of the gasoline vehicle are estimated as 0.30 kg CO2 eq./km mainly from the operation stage. An uncertainty analysis is carried out to assess the effects of variations of different input parameters on the total emissions. With a 95% level of confidence, the total emissions of the FCV with PV electrolysis is 0.18±0.05 kg CO2 eq./km. The component manufacturing and assembly stage drives the total GHG emissions uncertainty the most.
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي |
موضوع مقاله:
سوخت های جایگزین
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 | این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
